NV-3 · House

The district, in brief

Nevada's 3rd district comprises the western Las Vegas suburbs, including Spring Valley, Summerlin South and Sandy Valley, on the map first used in 2022. The text gives no presidential results; the facts record a 2024 presidential baseline on these lines of -0.7 points (two-party margin for the Democrat) and a two-party House margin of 2.74 points for the Democrat in 2024.

The incumbent is Democrat Susie Lee, re-elected with 51.4% of the vote in 2024, who won her primary with 69.2% (31,712 votes) over cardiologist James Lally (20.4%), Terrill Robinson (6.5%) and Brandon West (3.9%). The Republican nominee is Martin O'Donnell, a composer and the party's candidate for the district in 2024, who led the primary with 42.3% (14,892 votes) over Tera Anderson at 24.1%; the rest of the results table is garbled. His primary field included former ambassador to Iceland Jeff Gunter and neurosurgeon Aury Nagy, both largely self-funded. As of May 13, 2026 Lee had raised $3,862,399 with $3,310,178 on hand; O'Donnell had raised $3,336,873 with $2,199,728 on hand.

Decision Desk HQ (September 8, 2026), the Cook Political Report (February 6, 2025), Inside Elections (March 7, 2025) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (July 15, 2025) each list the seat as D; the Silver Bulletin row (August 23, 2026) shows no ranking. The text records no district polls.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Not in the source: The Republican primary results table is garbled after the second row, so Gunter's and Nagy's vote figures are missing.; The text gives no presidential results for the district; only the facts' presidential baseline is available.; No district polls are in the text, and the model's basis says no district polls.; No endorsements are listed for either nominee.; The Silver Bulletin row in the predictions table carries a date but no ranking.; No ratings finer than 'D' are given (no Lean/Likely/Safe).; Only May 13, 2026 fundraising figures are given for the general election; no June 30 report.

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 6f1158f89c88; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

Susie Lee (Democrat), in this chamber since 2019, 4 terms. Committees: House Committee on Natural Resources; House Committee on Appropriations.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

How it has voted for president

A shift of 8.7 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

Who are the voters?

Of about 562,410 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 53.4% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 52.6% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 1.6 points toward Republicans. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.

Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.

The money

FEC bulk candidate summaries through June 30, 2026; $73,077 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.

The district in numbers

ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.

Who is favoured, and by how much?

The 90% interval runs from +0.3 to +27.9 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.

What is this built on?

A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.

Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.

Why does the model say this?

Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: PAC money balance: 8.3 pts toward the Democrat; experience gap (+4 levels, D minus R): 3.6 pts toward the Democrat; 2024 presidential lean (D+0.8): 1.7 pts toward the Democrat; outside money balance: 1.1 pts toward the Republican; snap share income (0.7%): 0.6 pts toward the Democrat.

How sure is it, and of what?

Total sd 8.43 points, made of the seat's own volatility 90%, correlated polling error 10%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.

How was this number made?

Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).