FutureBallotU.S. election forecasts, with every number traced to its source

OK-3 · House

election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02

Safe R
0%
Suzie Byrd
Democrat
100%
Frank Lucas
Republican
Expected margin and its 90% range
R+40R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+40R+38.5
What moves this district (points of margin; blue toward the Democrat, red toward the Republican)
2024 presidential lean−26.2
2024 House lean−6.9
2022 House lean−2.9
federal civilian jobs share+1.1
asian share−0.9

The district, in brief

Oklahoma's 3rd district's description in the text is truncated; what survives names Enid, Stillwater, and the Oklahoma Panhandle. The lines are unchanged for 2026; the facts record the map as first used in 2022.

The incumbent is Republican Frank Lucas, re-elected unopposed in 2024. He won the Republican primary with 70.8% over Wade Burleson, an author and retired pastor for Emmanuel Baptist Church who ran for the district in 2022. The Democratic nominee is Suzie Byrd, a newspaper reporter for Enid News & Eagle, who won the Democratic primary with 67.4% over Jules Roberson, a warehouse worker. As of May 27, 2026 Lucas had raised $730,151 with $472,880 on hand; Byrd reported $0 raised.

Every rater listed calls the seat R: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (February 6, 2025), Inside Elections (March 7, 2025) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (October 10, 2025). The text records no district polls and no endorsements.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Incumbent
Frank Lucas (R)The incumbent is Republican Frank Lucas, who was re-elected unopposed in 2024.
Open seat
noThe incumbent is Republican Frank Lucas
Democratic nominee
Suzie ByrdSuzie Byrd, newspaper reporter for Enid News & Eagle
Republican nominee
Frank LucasFrank Lucas, incumbent U.S. representative
Democrat's background
newspaper reporter for Enid News & EagleSuzie Byrd, newspaper reporter for Enid News & Eagle
Republican's background
incumbent U.S. representativeFrank Lucas, incumbent U.S. representative
Last result
Lucas re-elected unopposed in 2024who was re-elected unopposed in 2024
Primaries
Lucas won the Republican primary 70.8% to 29.2% over Wade Burleson; Byrd won the Democratic primary 67.4% to 32.6% over Jules Robersoncandidate: Frank Lucas (Oklahoma politician) votes: 55,631 percentage: 70.8
Raters
Decision Desk HQ: R (July 14, 2026); Cook Political Report: R (February 6, 2025); Inside Elections: R (March 7, 2025); Sabato's Crystal Ball: R (October 10, 2025)Decision Desk HQ R July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report R February 6, 2025
Money
As of May 27, 2026: Lucas raised $730,151 with $472,880 on hand; Byrd reported $0Frank Lucas (R) $730,151 $875,556 $472,880
Also
Wade Burleson, an author, retired pastor and 2022 candidate for the district, was eliminated in the Republican primary with 29.2%Wade Burleson, author and retired pastor for Emmanuel Baptist Church and candidate for this district in 2022

Not in the source: The text's description of the district is truncated by a formatting error; only 'Enid, Stillwater, and the Oklahoma Panhandle' survives.; The text gives no presidential results for the district, and the facts carry no presidential baseline.; No district polls are recorded, and the model's basis says no district polls.; The Democratic primary fundraising table lists only Jules Roberson; no figures for Byrd's primary campaign appear.; The endorsements sections are empty.

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 54d7444c45f0; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

Frank D. Lucas (Republican), in this chamber since 1993, 17 terms. Committees: House Committee on Agriculture; House Committee on Financial Services.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

How it has voted for president

Two-party margin201620202024
PresidentR+46.6R+41.9R+41.9

A shift of 4.6 points toward the Democrats from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

Who are the voters?

Group (adults 25+)Share of adultsTurnout 2020 / midtermShare of a midterm electorateEst. Democratic share, 2020
White, no degree52%58% / 47%54%13%
White, degree17%79% / 72%27%46%
Black5%47% / 23%3%90%
Hispanic15%22% / 17%6%56%
Asian2%15% / 26%1%56%
Other / multiracial9%55% / 44%9%24%

Of about 507,007 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 28.1% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 27.7% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 0.8 points toward Republicans. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.

Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.

The money

CandidateRaisedCash on handPAC shareSelf-fundedOutside $ forOutside $ against
Lucas, Frank D. (REP)
incumbent
$907,279$532,51274%0%$0$0
Roberson, Jules (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$945$5110%11%$0$0

FEC bulk candidate summaries through June 30, 2026; no independent expenditures reported for or against any candidate, which usually means nobody outside the district thinks it is in play.

The district in numbers

MeasureDistrictNationDifference
Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+21.9%34.9%-13.1 pts
White, non-Hispanic61.5%58.2%+3.3 pts
Black, non-Hispanic4.8%12.0%-7.2 pts
Hispanic or Latino20.8%19.0%+1.8 pts
Asian, non-Hispanic1.5%5.8%-4.2 pts
Foreign-born8.7%13.9%-5.2 pts
Median age35.339.2-3.9
Median household income$57,932$84,362$-26,430
Median home value$151,800$379,737$-227,937
Owner-occupied homes64.2%65.1%-0.9 pts
Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data)4.3%4.4%-0.1 pts
Change in unemployment, past 12 months+1.1 pts——
Change since the last election (24 months)+1.0 pts——
Unemployment (ACS)4.7%5.2%-0.5 pts
Federal government workers4.0%2.6%+1.4 pts
Work from home6.0%13.5%-7.5 pts
Households on SNAP15.0%11.8%+3.3 pts
Households with Social Security income30.7%31.2%-0.5 pts
Households with public assistance income3.0%2.7%+0.3 pts
Moved in from another state, past year2.8%2.3%+0.5 pts
Gini index0.500.440.06
Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024$58,536$73,248$-14,712
Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 202428.9%32.0%-3.1 pts
Government and other transfers, share of income, 202422.1%19.6%+2.6 pts
Social Security, share of income, 20226.8%5.8%+0.9 pts
Medicare, share of income, 20225.2%4.5%+0.8 pts
Medicaid, share of income, 20223.4%4.0%-0.6 pts
SNAP, share of income, 20220.9%0.6%+0.3 pts
Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 20220.5%0.4%+0.1 pts
Veterans' benefits, share of income, 20221.3%0.9%+0.4 pts
Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 20222.3%1.3%+1.0 pts
Military jobs, share of all jobs, 20221.4%0.9%+0.5 pts

ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.

Who is favoured, and by how much?

>99%
Frank Lucas
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02
-38.6
expected margin, D-R
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02

The 90% interval runs from -52.3 to -24.8 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.

What is this built on?

A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.

Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.

Why does the model say this?

Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (R+45.4): 26.2 pts toward the Republican; 2024 House lean: 6.9 pts toward the Republican; 2022 House lean (R+46.7): 2.9 pts toward the Republican; federal civilian jobs share (2.3%): 1.1 pts toward the Democrat; asian share (1.6%): 0.9 pts toward the Republican.

How sure is it, and of what?

Total sd 8.39 points, made of the seat's own volatility 89%, correlated polling error 11%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.

How was this number made?

Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).